Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Mini Project # 7: Demographic data of my hometown

Hometown: Pembroke Pines, FL. 33025

Fact Sheet


Zip Code Tabulation Area 33025



GO

2000
2006 data not available for this geography
View a Fact Sheet for a race, ethnic, or ancestry group
Census 2000 Demographic Profile Highlights:

General Characteristics - show more >>

Number

Percent

U.S.

Total population

46,392

map

brief

Male

21,613

46.6

49.1%

map

brief

Female

24,779

53.4

50.9%

map

brief

Median age (years)

32.1

(X)

35.3

map

brief

Under 5 years

3,698

8.0

6.8%

map

18 years and over

33,697

72.6

74.3%

65 years and over

4,342

9.4

12.4%

map

brief

One race

44,112

95.1

97.6%

White

21,407

46.1

75.1%

map

brief

Black or African American

18,661

40.2

12.3%

map

brief

American Indian and Alaska Native

90

0.2

0.9%

map

brief

Asian

1,932

4.2

3.6%

map

brief

Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander

42

0.1

0.1%

map

brief

Some other race

1,980

4.3

5.5%

map

Two or more races

2,280

4.9

2.4%

map

brief

Hispanic or Latino (of any race)

11,195

24.1

12.5%

map

brief

Household population

45,766

98.7

97.2%

map

brief

Group quarters population

626

1.3

2.8%

map

Average household size

2.72

(X)

2.59

map

brief

Average family size

3.21

(X)

3.14

map

Total housing units

18,318

map

Occupied housing units

16,830

91.9

91.0%

brief

Owner-occupied housing units

10,234

60.8

66.2%

map

Renter-occupied housing units

6,596

39.2

33.8%

map

brief

Vacant housing units

1,488

8.1

9.0%

map

Social Characteristics - show more >>

Number

Percent

U.S.

Population 25 years and over

29,516

High school graduate or higher

25,684

87.0

80.4%

map

brief

Bachelor's degree or higher

7,536

25.5

24.4%

map

Civilian veterans (civilian population 18 years and over)

2,831

8.5

12.7%

map

brief

Disability status (population 5 years and over)

6,455

15.4

19.3%

map

brief

Foreign born

18,100

38.9

11.1%

map

brief

Male, Now married, except separated (population 15 years and over)

8,942

56.0

56.7%

brief

Female, Now married, except separated (population 15 years and over)

9,185

46.8

52.1%

brief

Speak a language other than English at home (population 5 years and over)

15,771

36.8

17.9%

map

brief

Economic Characteristics - show more >>

Number

Percent

U.S.

In labor force (population 16 years and over)

23,998

68.9

63.9%

brief

Mean travel time to work in minutes (workers 16 years and older)

32.1

(X)

25.5

map

brief

Median household income in 1999 (dollars)

45,761

(X)

41,994

map

Median family income in 1999 (dollars)

49,991

(X)

50,046

map

Per capita income in 1999 (dollars)

19,137

(X)

21,587

map

Families below poverty level

860

7.1

9.2%

map

brief

Individuals below poverty level

4,052

8.9

12.4%

map

Housing Characteristics - show more >>

Number

Percent

U.S.

Single-family owner-occupied homes

7,298

brief

Median value (dollars)

123,200

(X)

119,600

map

brief

Median of selected monthly owner costs

(X)

(X)

brief

With a mortgage (dollars)

1,272

(X)

1,088

map

Not mortgaged (dollars)

393

(X)

295

(X) Not applicable.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Summary File 1 (SF 1) and Summary File 3 (SF 3)

Demographic data retrieved from www.factfinder.census.gov

BARAKA






www.blog.vcu.edu/arts/events

BARAKA is a film that I must say is un-like any film I have ever seen. This film is strictly just a film with no sound, it is a matter of using your sight as well as using
your cognitive skills to piece together what exactly is going on. One might say that this film is boring, but I enjoyed it! It was an amazing experience. This film viewed the diversity from all over the world, as well as gave us some insight on different sceneries and animals.

This movie visited many different countries(which I found it easy to identify them because due to the symbols and statues it became obvious to me). With these countries you were able to see their land, the way that they live, the historical sites as well as statues, symbols, prayer and ritual. Remember there is no sound, and seldomly you heard music and different rhythms, therefore through out this movie you had to pay close attention and use your knowledge to get the general concept of what is really going on.

The movie began with mountains which were covered in snow...they suddenly began melting and birds started to fly back near the mountains, which gave a clue that winter was ending and they were coming back to a warmer place. It suddenly switched over to India. How do you know it was India? Well I found this obvious due to the nature of prayer and the symbols that were used. They displayed buildings and the city life, through out the city you saw people on the street carrying food and there were two men painting something symbolic on a wall. They switched over to a group that was praying with some type of painting on their foreheads.

There was a beautiful scene with water flowing and suddenly crashing against rocks, there were animals on the hills and suddenly there was a female who was carrying fruits and vegetables. There was a beautiful greenery scene with old statues in the middle of a deserted forest. There appeared to be some ancient Buddhist art on the wall which gave off that this was an Asian country. Another scene focused on a group of men with no shirts which appeared to be participating in some type of ritual.. There were men of all ages using their hands and chanting something that was unknown. One group would lay down while the other group swayed their hands and moved their fingers, it appeared as they were pushing/shrubbing something away from their bodies.

One of the sceneries was an empty green hillside, there was also a volcano which was ready to erupt, there was an intense use of music and you could see the redness of the lava flowing. There was smoke evolving all over the area. After this scene, komodo dragons became visible; and they were just stacked on top of each other. Followed by ancient drawings on stone, and suddenly there was a face of a dark man and there was a woman painting him. There were naked young girls who appeared to be of the Native American culture..or perhaps could have been of Central America or the Incan culture of Peru(South America). They were holding hands, and there were different colors of string that on them. There was a man chanting and doing body movement while kids sing.

It switched over to a different culture, which appeared to of the African descent. There were bald women and everyone was in jewels, bouncing up and down. Suddenly someone was sawing down a huge tree which ended up falling down on the land; a large amount of ants began pouring out. It then took us back to a city, this appeared to be a run down city. There many many kids who were just sitting at their windows, while other kids were walking up and down the streets. There was a change(not sure if it was in the same city where the kids were looking out of the window) but there were several woman working in a factory. They were each doing a different task, they did appear to be Asian but not of the chinese descent; perhaps they were Indonesian or from the Phillipes.

There is suddenly a city with a mall, and there are Asian men walking through the streets ringing a bell. There were several men who appeared to be in a jacuzzi in a spa and there was one man who stuck out and was very noticable. He had symbolic tattoos beginning from around his neck area down to his upper thigh. There was a new city which was flooded with people, there were cars and a lot of traffic. There were people on the subway and there were children who were in school. There was a factory which baby chickens and they were burning the tip of the beaks, the grown chickens were put into cages; which gave me the assumption that these chickens were being used for sale.

A new city had a mak working while a mule pulled him and his wagon. There was a group of people which consisted of children and families picking through the trash for food. There was a lady on the street with her children, and they had food and blankets. There was a small child on the street with a blanket and he appeared to be asking for money, kids were sleeping on the streets. There appeared to be a woman on the street, it was obvious she was a prostitute. There were 8 young girls with makeup on, standing outside of a strip club; assuming that these women were prostitues. You got the assumption that this country or city had major issues with poverty and they had to turn to any means possible for food as well as money.

Suddenly there was a different scene, it appeared to be of a deserted jail, there were pictures of inmates' shoes, I got the idea that maybe this was some type of camp? They all had #'s, and there were skulls of the dead as well as people's bones, all these people were asian. There were many statues of people lined up, perhaps these were all of the people who dies. Suddenly you are taken to Egypt, there is desert sand and statues. The next countries is most likely India, and the girls are bathing their hair in the water, the men are bathing in the water as wel. There are dead bodies which are being burned.

Baraka was an amazing movie. It took you to many different countries, where you were able to view different cultures and ways of life. Some countries had a life which consisted of being on land and participating in several rituals..some countries had more of a city life...and there were other countries which suffered severe poverty and had to search for food. This movie viewed the diversity all over the world and the lives that many people live as well as the environment. For example in Egypt you see the scenery which is covered with sand, than there were other countries where you saw majority of the country was filled with greenery. Different cultures and environment were percieved in this movie, and it was a great experience.

Friday, February 22, 2008

Brooklyn welcomes rare red panda Mao Mi

Brooklyn welcomes rare red panda Mao Mi
Posted on Thu, Feb. 21, 2008
The Associated Press

World Conservation Society, Julie Larsen Maher / AP Photo
In this photo released by the Wildlife Conservation Society, Mao Mi, a red panda that has just arrived at the Prospect Park Zoo in Brooklyn, N.Y., from his former home at the Binder Park Zoo in Michigan, gets familiar with his new environment, Wednesday, Feb. 20, 2008. Red pandas are an endangered species and Mao Mi is a beneficiary of a co-operative breeding program that works to ensure the survival of threatened or endangered species.


NEW YORK -- All the other animals must be green with envy.
The one getting the most attention at Brooklyn's Prospect Park Zoo these days is Mao Mi, a rare red panda that just arrived from his former home at Michigan's Binder Park Zoo.

Red pandas are endangered, and Mao Mi is part of a Wildlife Conservation Society breeding program that's trying to ensure the survival of threatened or endangered species.

Mao Mi has black legs, a furry reddish-brown face and body and white ears.
Prospect Park zookeepers said Thursday that their cuddly cutie is very playful and loves to climb trees and explore his new home.

Retrieved from The Herald : http://www.miamiherald.com/577/story/428372.html

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Mini Project #6

What precations are the local officials in your city taking regarding a biological terrorism attack?

To be quite honest, I cannot give a definite answer to this because I am not that up to date on the things that go on in my city regarding some of their precautions on terrorism, I have not heard anything on this specific topic so it is hard for me to really give an answer. What I do know is that my city/county does not take these issues lightly and the moment some suspicion is reported; they take this to the extreme and notify everyone as soon as possible. Every school is put on lock down and everyone must remain where they are. The police/fire fighters and paramedics are trained with the proper pre cautions and how to handle certain situations on terrorism and invaders. When it comes to the lives of individuals they always put safety first and keep us notified of what is going on, and the precautions they take are to ALWAYS ensure safety among the community!

Chapter 6: Environmental Health

War and terrorism is something that is not taken lightly, every war results in human tragedies; as well as causes damage to our environment. War causes people to lose their lives, their physical and mental health, and some are expelled from their communities (Barker,2003). When we think of war or we hear of what is going on in Iraq, our first thought is usually on the innocent lives or " the tax payers money", we seldemly stop to think about what this destruction is doing to the environment. Warfare includes destruction of the environment, defoliations or destruction of forest trees, pollution and/or destruction or alteration of water sources. The chemicals that we use during this warfare are destroying the environment. Chemical weapons are chemical substances which have been employed because of their direct toxic effects on man, animals and plants (Barker,2003). These chemicals destroy the environment as well as cause harm to us humans. Violence is not the answer, and this chemical warfare has caused many of the environmental problems that we face today. We cannot stop the war, nor do we have control over this; but we can express and pass along that violence is not the answer..because in the end..the violence is what harms us as humans and harms the environment that we live in.

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Swimming advisory for Collins Park Beach

MIAMI BEACH
Swimming advisory for Collins Park beach


Posted on Tue, Feb. 12, 2008

BY ADAM H. BEASLEY
abeasley@MiamiHerald.com

Miami Beachers beware: Swimming in the Atlantic may be hazardous to your health.
This comes from the Florida Department of Health, which said Tuesday that beach water at Collins Park beach has shown dangerously high amounts of the bacteria Enterococcus.
The beach, located at 21st Street, had an average level higher than the federal requirement, as recommended by the Environmental Protection Agency.


In short, people are recommended not to swim at Collins Park beach.
''The results of the sampling indicate that water contact may pose an increased risk of illness, particularly for susceptible individuals,'' according to a Department of Health press release.
The results of the samples collected at all other beaches in Miami-Dade were deemed satisfactory.


The high bacteria level is an indicator of fecal pollution. This may have been caused by storm water run-off, wildlife, pets and human sewage.

For information and updates, visit the Florida Healthy Beaches Program website at www.doh.state.fl.us. Select ''Beach Water Quality'' from the A-Z Topics list.

Article retrieved from The Herald: http://www.miamiherald.com/news/breaking_news/story/416109.html

Monday, February 11, 2008

Water crisis threatens Apalachicola oysters

Water crisis threatens Apalachicola oysters

The 18-year water war involving Florida, Alabama and Georgia is also 'Atlanta vs. the world' as the metropolitan area demands more water, which could threaten the ecology and economy downstream along the Apalachicola River.

Posted on Mon, Dec. 17, 2007

BY MARC CAPUTO
mcaputo@MiamiHerald.com

APALACHICOLA -- The endangered mussels are dying. Salt water parches the tupelo trees bees use to make honey. And the commercial shrimp harvest has faded along with many of the once-rich oyster banks where Bruce Rotella has scraped and scrapped a living for three decades.
The worst drought in years -- coupled with the water needs of booming Atlanta -- is leaving its scars on the people, animals and this shell-mound of a town's namesake stream, the Apalachicola River.
The politicians are in a bind, too. Florida Gov. Charlie Crist will host the governors of Alabama and Georgia at a meeting Monday about the waters of the river, formed at the junction of two other rivers that begin south and north of Atlanta and end at the Florida-Georgia line.


In the background of the talks: nearly 18 years of three-state water-war litigation over the management of the Apalachicola-Chatahoochee-Flint rivers system by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. If the course of the court fight is any predictor, the talks won't yield much.

That worries Bruce Rotella and the 1,100 oystermen here because time -- along with the water -- is running out as the corps reduces flows to historically low levels for the country's fifth-biggest river by volume to spill into the Gulf of Mexico.

''Except when hurricanes have hit, I've never seen it this bad. Things are good right now in a few spots. But they used to be good all over,'' says Rotella, ticking off the names of now-barren oyster banks where he remembers hauling up prize catches with each hefty basket clutched by his 10-foot, rake-like tongs.

The 107-mile river, its healthy waters and the shallow and protected bay into which it spills fuel the rapid growth of smooth-tasting oysters, the product of sunlight, river- and ocean-made flesh in the place locals call ''the Last Great Bay.'' About 10 percent of the oysters consumed in the nation and 90 percent of those eaten in Florida come from these waters.

The oyster's filter feeds and thrives with the tide and flow of both salt- and freshwater. The saltwater helps kill freshwater parasites and the freshwater blocks saltwater predators, like oyster drill snails, and parasites. If the water is the life's blood of the critters and economy, its flow is the pulse.

''You can't improve on that balance, on God's work. All man can really do is mess it up,'' says 50-year oysterman Bevin Putnal, a Franklin County commissioner who recalls catching oysters as big as a man's hand.

Putnal still goes out and tongs oyster, which are plentiful and profitable in some spots. For now. He says there will be enough for a few more years before things become as dire as they have for the shrimpers. The white shrimp are nowhere to be found. So the boats are tied up.

''No point paying for gas to look for something that ain't there,'' says shrimper Howard Horton, 62.

The people here noticed trouble in 2006 as the Army corps began cutting back freshwater flows to the river to ensure there was enough water in the system for cities, farmers and power-generating dams upstream. The flows, measured at the Jim Woodruff dam just south of the state line, were slashed between 50 and 75 percent starting in the summer months of 2006, according to Army corps data.

FLORIDA'S LAWSUIT
Florida sued, saying the minimum flow threshold of 5,000 cubic feet a second -- 2.24 million gallons a minute -- was too low. That's less than half the historic flow for this time of year, the dry season.


Florida also claims that a written opinion on the plan from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service allowed for too many endangered purple bankclimber and fat threeridge mussels downstream of the dam to be dried out and killed. Those mussels, along with the ancient Gulf sturgeon that spawns near the dam, are key to Florida's case.

The service and corps say that though the lower flow may harm the animals in the short term, storing the water in the system to ensure it doesn't run out entirely will help the species and all the other users in the long run.

Georgia Gov. Sonny Perdue has cast this as a man vs. mussels fight that poses a shellfish-or-children choice. Georgia says the corps and wildlife service have sent too much downstream from the premier recreation and drinking-water reservoir, Lake Lanier, which helps supply much of Atlanta's water and accounts for a maximum 62.5 percent of the total water in the Apalachicola-Chatahoochee-Flint system.

As the drought worsened, turning marina wet slips to dry docks, Perdue even asked President Bush in October to exempt Georgia from the Endangered Species Act to draw more water. Crist opposed it.

U.S. Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne, who will also be at Monday's meeting, advanced a new emergency plan in a sit-down with Crist, Perdue and Bob Riley, the governor of Alabama, who has largely been on Florida's side. Alabama's stake: It taps into the water system and relies on electricity produced in some of the dams.

The new emergency plan reduced the minimum flow down to 2.14 gallons a minute -- and even lower in some circumstances -- a level Florida wildlife experts, officials and oystermen say is lower than too low.

Unknown to many: Flows fell below this lower-than-low standard for four out of the past six months. November had the lowest monthly flow, 2.06 million gallons a minute.

After the new flow standard was announced, Crist appeared to support it. The people of Franklin County were appalled, prompting Crist to quickly clarify that he opposed the new operating plan. In a later meeting with Franklin County officials, he said, ``I'm with you.''

But he hasn't shown up in town. A number of supporters, from county and city commissioners to one of the river's experts, Dan Tonsmeire of the Riverkeepers nonprofit advocacy group, say they're waiting to see what Crist does and how he'll handle Georgia's crafty governor, Perdue, who proved a tough match for Crist's predecessor, Jeb Bush.
Said Rotella: ``Charlie Crist needs to man up.''


`PRAYING FOR RAIN'
But Rotella isn't holding out much hope for a government solution and is ''praying for rain.'' After all, the problems with the river and bay are as much a problem with nature as they are with government. In the 1950s, government created the system of dams and gouged a navigational channel into the bay that oystermen say allowed more freshwater to escape. And government allowed Atlanta's growth to spill out with few limitations.


A University of Georgia study found that, from 2001 to 2006, metropolitan Atlanta added 55 acres of concrete, rooftops and parking lots daily as it sprawled outwardly and redeveloped inwardly with less planning for water-conservation, supply or reuse. The area led the nation in population growth from 2000 to 2006 by gaining 890,000 residents -- more than 80 times Franklin County's entire population. The birthplace of Atlanta -- at the head of a watershed rather than downstream -- is a more unfixable problem.

Though Gov. Perdue has imposed water restrictions and declared much of Georgia a disaster area, the measures probably won't be enough. Georgia's water planning has lagged for years and officials from two Georgia water-planning agencies said the state didn't have a good grasp on how much water Atlanta consumed from year to year since 2000.

''This isn't Georgia vs. Florida. This is Atlanta vs. the world,'' says Jerry Sherk, a water-law expert who once worked for Georgia and that state's city of LaGrange, which is more aligned with Florida's position. ``Atlanta has one negotiating position: We want more.''

FOR ATLANTA'S USE
Indeed, the lawsuits began in 1989 when Alabama sued because Georgia persuaded the corps to allocate more water for Atlanta's use.


Sherk and other experts say they don't expect a settlement any time soon, due to the competing issues, the web of state and federal laws and agencies governing the system and the fact that Congress must be involved. They say the U.S. Supreme Court might ultimately decide the case and set a precedent as changes in climate and population push water conflicts, once a problem plaguing just western states, eastward.

In such disputes, economic issues are key, meaning Atlanta's claim that its $5.5 billion economy is in danger could have far more weight than Florida's claim that its $200 million commercial fishing and oystering industry is threatened.

So Florida is also highlighting the endangered species and the hundreds of millions the state and federal government have spent to buy land and preserve the river and the tupelo and cypress trees plied by the birds and bees.

At the Bay City Lodge, an old cypress mill operation-turned-fish-camp where river otters from Poorhouse Creek eat the grouper scraps, owner Jimmy Mosconis says he's noticing more saltwater fish where the fresh ones used to be and he wonders how long the river can remain what it was.

If it changes, gets saltier and lower, oystermen like Rotella say they'll eventually have to leave for other banks in Texas and Louisiana.

''This is our bank. This is where we get money,'' he says.
``It's our way of life and our heritage. Those people in Atlanta need to know that. They need to share the pain.''

More gators could be on prowl

THE EVERGLADES ALLIGATORS

More gators could be on prowl

Posted on Thu, Apr. 12, 2007

BY CURTIS MORGAN
cmorgan@MiamiHerald.com
When alligator mating season heats up in a few weeks, there is a possibility that the drought could push more big reptiles into some neighborhoods, particularly western ones fringing the Everglades.

It's a prospect that might put brown lawns and dirty cars in perspective.
Gators start showing up around this time every year, lurking on suburban lawns or snapping in backyard lakes -- on the hunt for sex, food and, in the case of smaller males, a wet haven safely away from hormonally juiced, cannibalistic, bigger gators.


Dry conditions in the Everglades, as well as lower suburban ponds and canals, could put more gators on the prowl. But Lindsey Hord, nuisance alligator coordinator for the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, doesn't expect any significant change from an annual movement that grew more unsettling after three fatal attacks on humans last May.
Hord, mindful of public jitters, stressed that the ability of gators to make long-distance treks is often overstated.


''There is no wholesale migration to the urban areas,'' he said. Gators, he said, typically range no more than 1,000 meters.

But communities just east of the state water conservation areas, where gators are persistent issues, could see a bump in sightings.

''There may be some trying to get around the bigger, dominant animals, but where are they going to go?'' he said. ``It's like a gauntlet. What they usually do is just get killed.''
Frank Mazzotti, a University of Florida scientist who monitors gator and crocodile populations in South Florida, said less is known about their behavior during the extreme droughts possible this year.


Gators wallow out their own holes in the marsh and are capable of living a month burrowed into mud, a survival tactic called aestivating, Mazzotti said.

But others, driven by hunger as water holes dry up, might well make longer treks than normal.
''It's not like a mass exodus, but if the number increases from 1 percent to 5 percent, that's a lot more,'' he said. ``On the receiving end, you'd notice them showing up.''


Retrieved from The Herald: http://www.miamiherald.com/news/miami_dade/story/70952.html

Mini Project #5 Pollution in Your Neighborhood

There are several Superfund sites located in Broward County. Some have been deleted but there are several which still exist.


1. FLORIDA PETROLEUM REPROCESSORS



Site Address:
3211 S.W. 50TH AVENUEFORT LAUDERDALE, Florida33314

County: BROWARD

U.S. Congressional District: 20

Population within one mile: 10,001-50,000


Federal Register Notice: March 6, 1998

For more information on this site regarding: Site Location, Cleanup Progress Summary, Cleanup Impact Summary, Contamination & Exposure, Cleanup Process & Progress, and Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) Milestones. Please visit the website which can be retrieved at: http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0406469

Conditions at Proposal (April 1997): The Florida Petroleum Reprocessors (FPR) site is located in a mixed residential and commercial area in Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida. The site was originally owned and operated by Oil Conservationists, Inc. (OCI). OCI functioned as a waste oil transfer station from 1978 to mid-1985. Prior to 1978, the site was vacant. FPR leased the site from OCI in mid-1985, and later purchased the property in mid-1986 or 1987. From 1985 until about 1991, FPR purchased waste oils, fuels, and oily wastewaters from automotive, agricultural, and marine industries of south Florida, as well as state, municipal, and Federal generators. Upon receipt, the waste oils and wastewaters were tested for halogens and then stored on site in aboveground storage tanks. Waste oils were processed and then delivered to asphalt plants for use as fuel, used oil marketers, or phosphate mines for use as a flotation oil.

Sometime before mid-1985, OCI was cited by the Broward County Environmental Quality Control Board for (1) several releases or discharges of waste oils, grease, and hazardous substances, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs); and (2) chlorinated solvent contamination in ground water monitoring wells at concentrations exceeding county standards. As a result of the county citations, OCI, and subsequently FPR, retained Southeast Environmental Consultants, Inc. (SEEC), to conduct a contamination assessment and install additional monitoring wells at the site. According to SEEC reports, the aboveground storage tanks were moved into an on-site concrete containment area, an underground drop tank was removed, and monitoring wells were installed on site prior to late 1985.

Analytical results of samples collected by SEEC, which confirmed VOC contamination of on-site soils and ground water underlying the site, were provided to the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER) in 1986, 1991, and 1992. Approximately 60 tons of soil contaminated with waste oils and chlorinated solvents were subsequently excavated. During the excavation, waste oil free product was encountered in on-site soil and the excavation was terminated because SEEC concluded that the free product abatement was beyond the scope of the clean up at that time. In 1995, VOCs were still detected in ground water samples collected by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from FPR monitoring wells. Samples collected by EPA from aboveground tanks indicated the presence of 1,1-dichloroethane, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, trichloroethene, and tetrachloroethene. Characterization and remedial activities are currently ongoing at the site.

During the testing of analytical equipment in December 1986, the City of Fort Lauderdale detected chlorinated solvents, primarily 1,2-dichloroethene, at high concentrations in municipal well 18 of the south Peele-Dixie well field, located just over 1 mile north of the FPR site. As a result of the contamination, the city closed down the south well field. Some of the wells were later put back on line, and an air tower used for pump-and-treat operations was constructed to remove contamination from the ground water. The Peele-Dixie well field currently contributes to a municipal system that serves nearly 54,000 connections. At least eight additional municipal systems obtain potable water from well fields located within 4 miles of the site.

Ground water monitoring conducted by the City of Fort Lauderdale and FDER at the Peele-Dixie well field from the mid-1980s to the early 1990s has shown consistent detection of VOCs, including 1,2-dichloroethene, trichloroethene, and vinyl chloride.

Status (March 1998): EPA has completed a Remedial Investigation (RI) and Baseline Risk Assessment Evaluation of cleanup alternatives, and a Feasibility Study is underway. Results of the RI and previous characterization studies indicate that the FPR facility is a significant source of the ground water contamination.
(http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/nar1491.htm)

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.


2. HOLLINGSWORTH SOLDERLESS TERMINAL



Site Address:
700 NW 57TH PLACEFORT LAUDERDALE, Florida33309

County: BROWARD

U.S. Congressional District: 23

Population within one mile: 10,001-50,000


For more information on this site regarding: Site Location, Cleanup Progress Summary, Cleanup Impact Summary, Contamination & Exposure, Cleanup Process & Progress, and Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) Milestones. Please visit: http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0400548

Federal Register Notice: September 8, 1983Conditions at listing (October 1981): Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Co. manufactures small, solderless electrical connectors on a site of less than 1 acre in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. In the process, the connectors are cut and forced out of copper sheets, annealed, degreased, and then electroplated with tin or nickel. From about 1976 to 1981, Hollingsworth injected trichloroethylene, oil, grease, and dyes into a 100-foot-deep well on-site and discharged electroplating wastes into a large on-site drainfield. In addition, wastes periodically entered the ground through spillage or other smaller drainfields. Several communities in the vicinity of the site draw water from the shallow Biscayne Aquifer.

Status (July 1983): In July 1982, Hollingsworth took several steps to correct the problem or characterize the extent of contamination. The company pumped the injection well, installed 16 on-site monitoring wells, sampled soil, conducted a ground water gradient study, and sampled public wells. Various levels of contamination were found in some of the monitoring wells, water supply wells, and soil samples.

EPA recently prepared a Remedial Action Master Plan outlining the investigations needed to determine the full extent of cleanup required at the site.

It will guide further actions at the site.
For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet at
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.
(http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/nar399.htm)


3. PETROLEUM PRODUCTS CORP




Site Address:
14000 BLOCK PEMBROKE ROADPEMBROKE PARK, Florida33024

County: BROWARD

U.S. Congressional District: 23,20

Population within one mile: 10,001-50,000


For more information on this site regarding: Site Location, Cleanup Progress Summary, Cleanup Impact Summary, Contamination & Exposure, Cleanup Process & Progress, and Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) Milestones. Please visit: http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0400919

Federal Register Notice: July 22, 1987
Conditions at proposal (April 10, 1985): Petroleum Products Corp. refined, stored, and recycled oil on a 2-acre site in Pembroke Park, Broward County, Florida, from about 1952 to 1972. Poor housekeeping and equipment maintenance resulted in soils becoming heavily impregnated with oil and the formation of a layer of organic chemicals on the shallow Biscayne Aquifer beneath the site. The aquifer is contaminated with lead and PCBs, according to Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (DER) analyses of monitoring wells. Pits covering an extensive area on the site contain sludges generated in the oil recycling process. Although the area was filled and paved over in 1970-74, it continues to discharge oily materials, especially during the rainy season.


The City of Hallandale well field is less than 0.5 mile downgradient from the site; two other municipal well fields are located within 3 miles. More than 150,000 people obtain their drinking water from these wells.

DER filed suit against Petroleum Products in June 1984 in Broward County Circuit Court to force the company to clean up the site or to allow the State to use its own funds and then to assess penalties for cost recovery.

After EPA issued a CERCLA Section 106 order for an immediate removal action at the site, EPA and Petroleum Products entered into a Consent Order on April 1, 1985. The order required the company to perform tasks outlined in an Immediate Removal Work Plan, which is incorporated as part of the Consent Order.

Status (July 22, 1987): Petroleum Products removed the drums, storage tanks, and contaminated sludge and transported the materials to an EPA-regulated disposal site.
In May 1986, DER began a State-financed remedial investigation involving the contaminated ground water, soil, and sludges. The investigation is nearing completion; all field work has been finished.


For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.
(
http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/nar431.htm)


4. WINGATE ROAD MUNICIPAL INCINERATOR DUMP




Site Address:
1300 N. W. 34TH AVENUEFORT LAUDERDALE, Florida33311

County: BROWARD

U.S. Congressional District: 23

Population within one mile: 10,001-50,000


For more information on this site regarding: Site Location, Cleanup Progress Summary, Cleanup Impact Summary, Contamination & Exposure, Cleanup Process & Progress, and Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) Milestones. Please visit: http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0401078

Federal Register Notice: October 4, 1989

Conditions at proposal (June 24, 1988): The Wingate Road Municipal Incinerator Dump covers 61 acres in Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida. The site includes an incinerator, offices, and an approximately 40-acre disposal area, all owned and operated by the City of Fort Lauderdale. Land use in the area is a combination of residential, commercial, and industrial.

The incinerator and disposal areas were used during 1955-78. Residential waste, commercial waste, and incinerator residue were disposed of at the dump. According to a resident of the area, hazardous waste may also have been dumped. In December 1981, the resident reported to the Broward County Health Department that 100 steel drums had been buried during 1955-58 north of the incinerator down a dirt road.

The facility received 480 tons of waste a day and operated 7 days a week. It pumped cooling water into the incinerator from on-site wells and then discharged it into an unlined lagoon, possibly Lake Stupid in the southeast corner of the facility. Ash residues mixed with sludge material from the lagoon were spread onto the ground in the disposal area.

The area is approximately 30 feet above ground, and the terrain is hilly and partially overgrown with brush and small trees. Rock Pit Lake is downslope of the northeast section of the disposal area.

Tests conducted in 1985 by EPA detected pesticides (DDT, aldrin, chlordane, and dieldrin) in surface composite soil and subsurface soil from the dump area. Elevated pesticide concentrations were also reported in sediments from Rock Pit Lake, which is used for recreational activities. The lake intersects the Biscayne Aquifer, which EPA has designated as a sole source aquifer under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Thus, there is a threat of contaminants entering the aquifer. An estimated 353,000 people draw drinking water from four municipal well fields within 3 miles of the site: the Lauderhill Municipal Water Supply Well Field, the Broward County District 1A Well Field, the Prospect Well Field, and the Dixie Well Field. There is no unthreatened alternative source for the Lauderhill field.

The site is only partially fenced, making it possible for people and animals to come into direct contact with hazardous substances. Approximately 44,000 people live within 1 mile of the site.

Status (October 4, 1989): EPA is conducting a search to identify parties potentially responsible for wastes associated with the site.


The State is reviewing Fort Lauderdale's plan for closing the dump under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.

Fort Lauderdale has fenced the site.

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737. (http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/nar428.htm)